Asked by Emily Talbot on Jul 26, 2024
Verified
On a cold winter day, A slipped on the icy sidewalk at the entrance to B's shop. A injured her ankle as a result of the fall, and B hired a taxi to have her taken to the hospital to have her injured ankle examined. On the way to the hospital another automobile collided with the taxi, and A was seriously injured. The court would consider what a reasonable person would have done or foreseen in determining the duty of care in this case.
Reasonable Person
A standard of care used to measure acts of negligence.
Duty of Care
A legal obligation which requires a person to adhere to a standard of reasonable care while performing any acts that could foreseeably harm others.
Foreseen
Anticipated or predicted as likely to happen in the future.
- Understand the principle of duty of care and foreseeability in negligence cases.
Verified Answer
ZK
Zybrea KnightAug 01, 2024
Final Answer :
True
Explanation :
In determining the duty of care, the court would consider what a reasonable person would have done or foreseen in the circumstances, including the foreseeability of harm from the icy sidewalk and the subsequent actions taken to mitigate that harm.
Learning Objectives
- Understand the principle of duty of care and foreseeability in negligence cases.