Asked by Brenda Oliveira on Jul 30, 2024
Verified
Melinda,who works in a jewelry store owned by Cindy,was picking up some gemstones for use in the store.On the way back to the jewelry store,she went through a drive-through at a fast food restaurant to get a soda.While in line,she negligently bumped the vehicle in front of her that was owned by Ralph.Melinda did not have insurance.Ralph asked Cindy to pay for the damage to his bumper.Cindy refused on the basis that she never gave Melinda authority to stop for a soda.Should Cindy be held liable,and why or why not?
Authority
The legal right or power to make decisions, give orders, or act on behalf of another person or entity.
Liable
Being legally responsible for an action or outcome; subject to legal obligation or liability.
Negligently
Acting with a lack of proper care or attention that a reasonable person would use in similar circumstances, often leading to harm or damages.
- Evaluate the legal accountability and duties in scenarios where negligence occurs within the framework of employment.
- Evaluate scenarios to determine liability in agency contexts.
Verified Answer
AM
aaliyah mogajiAug 05, 2024
Final Answer :
Cindy should be held liable.Melinda was not acting on behalf of Cindy when the accident occurred.She did not,however,make a substantial departure from the business of the employer; therefore,Cindy would be subject to liability.
Learning Objectives
- Evaluate the legal accountability and duties in scenarios where negligence occurs within the framework of employment.
- Evaluate scenarios to determine liability in agency contexts.