John Galloway and John Adams held different positions on the constitutional relationship between England and its colonies. Using Galloway's plan of union and the crucial clauses proposed by John Adams and contained in the Declaration of Rights and Grievances, contrast their positions.

John Galloway and John Adams had differing views on the constitutional relationship between England and its colonies. Galloway's plan of union, proposed in 1774, aimed to create a unified government for the colonies under British rule, with a president appointed by the king and a grand council elected by the colonial assemblies. This plan sought to maintain a close relationship with England while granting the colonies more autonomy in their governance.

On the other hand, John Adams, in the Declaration of Rights and Grievances, proposed crucial clauses that emphasized the rights of the colonies to self-governance and representation. These included the assertion that the colonies had the right to levy their own taxes and make their own laws, and that they should have representation in the British Parliament. Adams' position was more focused on asserting the independence and self-determination of the colonies, rather than seeking a unified government under British authority.

In contrast, Galloway's plan of union sought to maintain a closer relationship with England and create a more centralized government structure, while Adams' Declaration of Rights and Grievances emphasized the need for greater autonomy and representation for the colonies. These differing positions reflect the broader debates and tensions surrounding the constitutional relationship between England and its colonies during this period.