Asked by Marcus Morgan on Jul 20, 2024

verifed

Verified

In the late 1800s, Louis Pasteur was searching for a vaccine for anthrax in livestock. One French veterinarian had a local reputation for being able to cure anthrax by applying oils and wrapping the animal in cloth to induce a fever. Pasteur also knew that some animals recovered well on their own when left untreated. Pasteur tested the effectiveness of the local veterinarian's methods by injecting four cattle with anthrax bacteria. He then directed the veterinarian to perform his procedures on two cattle. The other two cattle were left alone. What is the rationale for Pasteur's experimental design?

A) Two cattle represent a test of the veterinarian's hypothesis; two represent a test of Pasteur's hypothesis.
B) Two cattle represent a test of the treatment; two serve as a control to determine the likelihood of survival without treatment.
C) Two cattle represent a test based on inductive reasoning; two serve to test deductive reasoning.
D) The two cattle that are treated are the only test being conducted; the other two cattle serve no purpose beyond representing all the untreated cattle in France.
E) The two cattle not being treated were just a whim on Pasteur's part.

Anthrax Bacteria

A bacterium known as Bacillus anthracis that causes the acute disease anthrax, affecting both humans and animals.

Inductive Reasoning

A method of reasoning in which specific observations lead to a general conclusion or theory.

Deductive Reasoning

The use of general principles to predict specific outcomes. Often uses “if… then” statements.

  • Absorb the essence of the scientific method's involvement in biological inquiry and its application in surmounting issues in the actual world.
verifed

Verified Answer

MJ
Micheline Jn BaptisteJul 25, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
Pasteur's experimental design includes using two cattle as a control group to determine the likelihood of survival without treatment, while the other two cattle are treated to test the effectiveness of the local veterinarian's procedures. This allows him to compare the outcomes of treatment versus no treatment and determine whether the veterinarian's methods are actually effective.