Asked by shadyra basurto on Jun 04, 2024

verifed

Verified

In the Case Opener, a decision of the Federal Trade Commission blocking a proposed merger between Polypore and Microporous Products was appealed on the basis that it would substantially lessen competition. Which of the following was the result on appeal?

A) That the Federal Trade Commission erred in treating the merger as a vertical merger instead of a horizontal merger and that the proposed merger should have been allowed to proceed.
B) That the Federal Trade Commission erred in determining that the proposed merger would substantially lessen competition and that the merger should have been allowed to proceed.
C) That the Federal Trade Commission erred in asserting jurisdiction over the dispute and that the matter would be remanded to the federal district court.
D) That the Federal Trade Commission properly determined that a horizontal merger was involved that would substantially lessen competition.
E) That although the Federal Trade Commission erred in treating the merger as a horizontal merger rather than as a vertical merger, the Commission properly determined that the proposed merger would substantially lessen competition.

Federal Trade Commission

A U.S. federal agency tasked with protecting consumers and promoting competition, enforcing antitrust and consumer protection laws.

Polypore

A type of fungus with pores or tubes on the underside, which releases spores.

Microporous Products

Products designed with very small pores that allow for filtration, absorption, or other interactions with particles and fluids at the microscopic level.

  • Understand the influence of mergers and acquisitions on competitive dynamics within a sector.
verifed

Verified Answer

ZK
Zybrea KnightJun 06, 2024
Final Answer :
D
Explanation :
The appeal confirmed that the Federal Trade Commission correctly identified the merger as a horizontal merger that would substantially lessen competition, upholding the decision to block the merger.