Asked by Emily Jackson on May 26, 2024

verifed

Verified

In the case of Speelman v. Pascal , the court held that:

A) a gratuitous assignment is terminated by the assignor's death, even if the assignor made an effective delivery of the assignment prior to his death.
B) assignments of rights to sums that are expected to become due to the assignor are enforceable.
C) assignments cannot be made of sums that are not presently due but are expected to become due in the future.
D) personal contracts are not assignable.

Speelman V. Pascal

A landmark legal case that dealt with copyright infringement and the assignment of copyrights, setting precedents in intellectual property law.

Gratuitous Assignment

The transfer of rights or property from one party to another without the expectation of receiving something in return.

Assignor's Death

The occurrence and effects on a contractual agreement or obligation when the individual who assigned their rights or obligations under the contract dies.

  • Gain an understanding of the judicial impacts and necessities for assignments and delegations.
verifed

Verified Answer

SP
Steve PrietoJun 01, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
In Speelman v. Pascal, the court held that assignments of rights to sums that are expected to become due to the assignor are indeed enforceable. This case is often cited to support the principle that future payments or rights expected to arise can be legally assigned to another party.