In the case in the text New Randolph Halsted Currency Exchange v.Regent Title Insurance Company,what was the court's holding when it determined that New Randolph could qualify as a holder in due course?

A) It took the check without notice that any party had a claim in recoupment to it.
B) It acted in good faith.
C) It took the check for value.
D) It acted in a commercially reasonable manner in seeking to determine the authenticity of the check.

Claim In Recoupment

A legal claim or defense allowing a defendant in a lawsuit to assert a right to reduce the amount of damages owed by claiming a corresponding claim against the plaintiff.

Good Faith

The honest intention to act without taking an unfair advantage over another party, often an underlying principle in contracts.

Authenticity

The quality of being genuine or not counterfeit, and the verification of something as being true or legitimate.