Asked by Destini Crawford on May 06, 2024
Verified
In the case in the text,Massachusetts v.Environmental Protection Agency,the U.S.Supreme Court held that:
A) EPA failed to demonstrate public policy required a different result.
B) EPA was not legally justified to refuse to regulate greenhouse gas emission from automobiles.
C) the State of Massachusetts did not have legal standing to sue EPA.
D) the State of Massachusetts failed to demonstrate global warming caused the water to rise.
Greenhouse Gas Emission
The release of gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane, that trap heat in the Earth's atmosphere, contributing to global warming.
Massachusetts V. Environmental Protection Agency
A landmark legal case where the EPA was found to have the authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act.
- Interpret court decisions related to environmental laws.
Verified Answer
HL
Howard LobsterMay 08, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
EPA offered no reasoned explanation for its refusal to decide whether greenhouse gases cause or contribute to climate change.Its action was therefore arbitrary,capricious,or otherwise not in accordance with law.
Learning Objectives
- Interpret court decisions related to environmental laws.