Asked by Isaiah Diller on Jul 17, 2024
Verified
In the case in the text,Drake Manufacturing Company,Inc.v.Polyflow,Inc. ,why did the court find in favor of the defendant?
A) The plaintiff's actions in Pennsylvania constituted "doing business" and it failed to timely obtain a certificate of authority.
B) Although the plaintiff's actions did not constitute "doing business" its use of the certificate of authority during post-trial proceedings was erroneous.
C) The lower court abused its discretion when it found in favor of the defendant because its activities in the state did not make it liable in that state.
D) The plaintiff was not properly incorporated in any state.
Certificate of Authority
A document that grants a company the legal right to conduct business outside of its original state of registration.
Doing Business
This term refers to engaging in any activity or actions that constitute the operations and responsibilities of a business entity.
Abuse of Discretion
A legal term indicating a failure to take into proper consideration, the facts and law relating to a particular matter; an arbitrary or unreasonable departure from precedent and settled judicial custom.
- Investigate the legal benchmarks for the operation and presence of overseas companies in various legal territories.
Verified Answer
Learning Objectives
- Investigate the legal benchmarks for the operation and presence of overseas companies in various legal territories.
Related questions
In the International Shoe Case,the United States Supreme Court Held ...
A Foreign Corporation Must Incorporate in Each State in Which ...
Doing Intrastate Business Without Filing with the Appropriate State Office ...
There Is a Similar Set of Legal Rules That Applies to ...
According to the Supreme Court of the United States,a Foreign ...