Asked by Jessica Jackson on Apr 29, 2024
Verified
In Schenck v.United States the Court ruled that the speech could be limited if it presented a(n)
A) malicious libel.
B) clear and present danger.
C) threat to community values.
D) intent to harm.
Schenck V. United States
is a landmark 1919 Supreme Court case that established the "clear and present danger" test for restrictions on free speech, related to circumstances under which the government can regulate speech in the interest of national security.
Clear And Present Danger
A doctrine used to test whether limitations may be placed on First Amendment freedoms of speech, press, or assembly when the exercise of these rights presents an immediate danger.
- Understand the stance and judicial assessments of the Supreme Court concerning liberties and limitations.
Verified Answer
JA
Jalisa ArleneApr 29, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court introduced the "clear and present danger" test to determine when speech could be limited, ruling that speech presenting a clear and present danger to the country's recruitment efforts during World War I could be restricted.
Learning Objectives
- Understand the stance and judicial assessments of the Supreme Court concerning liberties and limitations.