Asked by Ashley Devaprasad on Apr 29, 2024
Verified
In Berg v. Traylor , the court found that:
A) a minor may not disaffirm an agreement signed by a parent.
B) the disaffirmance of an agreement by a minor does not operate to terminate the contractual obligations of the parent who signed the agreement.
C) Craig could not disaffirm the contract to secure personal management services because it was a contract to provide his and his family's necessaries.
D) Craig, an infant, could not disaffirm in this case because it would cause undue hardship on the other party.
Disaffirm
To officially reject, deny, or revoke a statement or agreement, especially in the context of contracts by minors or under conditions of misrepresentation.
Undue Hardship
A situation where accommodations or changes, typically required by law, would result in significant difficulty or expense for an employer or institution.
- Acknowledge the right of minors to invalidate contracts and grasp the scenarios where such invalidation holds validity.
- Distinguish among voidable, void, and unenforceable agreements, particularly concerning minors and persons with insufficient capacity.
Verified Answer
JB
Janice Bulan-BartolomeMay 01, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
The court in Berg v. Traylor found that the disaffirmance of an agreement by a minor does not operate to terminate the contractual obligations of the parent who signed the agreement. This means that while a minor may have the right to disaffirm a contract, this action does not affect the contractual obligations of a parent who also signed the contract.
Learning Objectives
- Acknowledge the right of minors to invalidate contracts and grasp the scenarios where such invalidation holds validity.
- Distinguish among voidable, void, and unenforceable agreements, particularly concerning minors and persons with insufficient capacity.