Asked by Edward Chang on May 21, 2024
Verified
In a case of intentional interference,a defendant generally escapes liability when his contract interference:
A) was guided by public interest.
B) was defamatory in nature.
C) was regarding prospective competitive advantage.
D) was guided by a void bargain.
Intentional Interference
Deliberate actions by a person intended to disrupt or interfere with another's contractual or business relationships.
Public Interest
The welfare or well-being of the general public, often considered in legislation, government actions, and legal decisions.
Prospective Competitive Advantage
The potential for a firm to achieve a future position where it outperforms rivals in efficiency, quality, innovation, or customer service.
- Discriminate among various legal wrongs in the context of business operations and reputational impacts, including defamation, injurious falsehood, and intentional interference.
Verified Answer
HC
Himanshu ChaudharyMay 22, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
A defendant in a case of intentional interference generally escapes liability when his/her contract interference is in the public interest or to protect a person for whose welfare he/she is responsible.
Learning Objectives
- Discriminate among various legal wrongs in the context of business operations and reputational impacts, including defamation, injurious falsehood, and intentional interference.