Asked by Avnish Jauhal on May 20, 2024
Verified
In 2011,
A) the House of Representatives dramatically increased the number of earmarks in their spending bills while the Senate dramatically decreased the number of earmarks in their spending bills.
B) the Senate dramatically increased the number of earmarks in their spending bills while the House of Representatives dramatically decreased the number of earmarks in their spending bills.
C) both the House of Representatives and the Senate dramatically increased the number of earmarks in their spending bills.
D) the House and the Senate agreed to a two-year moratorium on earmarks in spending bills.
Moratorium
A temporary halt or suspension of an activity or law, usually by government decree.
Earmarks
Provisions added to legislation that allocate specific funds for particular projects, usually at the behest of a legislator to benefit their own constituents or interests.
- Scrutinize the mechanics of congressional financial allocation, particularly looking at pork-barrel politics and its influence on local development projects.
Verified Answer
AY
Ahmad YassineMay 23, 2024
Final Answer :
D
Explanation :
In 2011, both the House of Representatives and the Senate agreed to a two-year moratorium on earmarks in spending bills. This means that neither the House nor the Senate dramatically increased or decreased the number of earmarks in their spending bills during that time period.
Learning Objectives
- Scrutinize the mechanics of congressional financial allocation, particularly looking at pork-barrel politics and its influence on local development projects.
Related questions
Between 1995 and 2006,the Number of Congressional Earmarks ...
________ Bills Are One of Congress's Favorite Vehicles for Pork-Barrel ...
One Reason Why Some People Support the Establishment of Term ...
Well Over Half of All State and Local Government Expenditures ...
Which Is the Most Accurate Statement ...