Asked by Jackson Hooper on Jun 11, 2024

verifed

Verified

If Nadine and Luigi go to court to resolve their contract dispute and their contract has an antiassignment clause, how will the court generally treat the clause?

A) As an invalid clause because the courts do not believe in antiassignment clauses.
B) As clause against public policy.
C) As a set of promises.
D) As an invalid agreement under the statute of frauds.
E) As an effective clause as long as there is additional compensation paid by one of the parties.

Antiassignment Clause

A provision in a contract that prohibits one party from transferring its rights and obligations under the contract to another entity without consent.

Statute of Frauds

A legal principle that requires certain types of contracts to be in writing and signed by the party to be charged, to prevent fraud and perjury in contractual agreements.

  • Understand the effect of anti-assignment clauses in contracts.
verifed

Verified Answer

AD
Alyssa DanielleJun 14, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
Antiassignment clauses are treated as a set of promises within a contract, indicating the parties' agreement that their rights and obligations under the contract cannot be transferred to another party without consent. Courts generally uphold these clauses as valid and enforceable parts of a contract.