Asked by Rebika Basnet on Jun 19, 2024
Verified
Humorous or satirical accounts ordinarily are not considered to be defamation unless:
A) a reasonable reader believes them to be real events.
B) they are political in nature.
C) the plaintiff can prove that they are about him/her.
D) they expressly state so.
Defamation
The practice of harming an individual's reputation through the dissemination of untrue and detrimental remarks.
Humorous
Characterized by the quality of being amusing or entertaining, often involving a sense of wit.
Satirical
Characterized by the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, etc.
- Furnish an explanation of defamation, outline its separate forms, and discuss the lawful defenses that can be invoked in instances of defamation.
Verified Answer
JJ
Josiah JordanJun 22, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
Most courts say that fictional accounts may be defamatory if a reasonable reader would identify the plaintiff as the subject of the story.Similarly,humorous or satirical accounts ordinarily are not defamation unless a reasonable reader would believe that they purport to describe real events.
Learning Objectives
- Furnish an explanation of defamation, outline its separate forms, and discuss the lawful defenses that can be invoked in instances of defamation.
Related questions
Most Defamation Cases Brought by Public Official or Public Figure ...
Dave Tells Dora That Phil,a Financial Advisor,has Been Stealing Money ...
Which of the Following Is Most Likely to Involve Both ...
In General,liability for Defamation Requires ...
An Essential Element of the Tort Is That the Alleged ...