Asked by rachel Anderson on Apr 28, 2024

verifed

Verified

How did the Stamp Act differ from the Sugar Act?

A) Whereas the Stamp Act was still in place at the time of the outbreak of the Revolutionary War, the Sugar Act was quickly repealed.
B) Whereas the Stamp Act affected, and therefore offended, a large portion of the colonial population, the Sugar Act mainly affected residents of colonial ports.
C) Whereas the Stamp Act was predominantly opposed by northern merchants, the Sugar Act was mainly opposed by southern planters.
D) Whereas the Stamp Act was passed in close collaboration with colonial leaders, the Sugar Act was a total surprise to the colonists.
E) Whereas the Stamp Act focused on the regulation of trade, the Sugar Act was a direct tax on the colonists.

Sugar Act

A law enacted by the British Parliament in 1764 aiming to raise revenue from the American colonies by imposing a tax on sugar and molasses imported into the colonies.

Stamp Act

A 1765 British law imposing a tax on all paper documents in the American colonies, leading to widespread protest and contributing to the American Revolution.

  • Acquire understanding of the pivotal roles and impacts of major legislative actions taken by the British Parliament.
  • Acquire knowledge on the precipitating causes of the Stamp Act and its initial impact on colonial America.
verifed

Verified Answer

JR
Joseph RodriguezApr 28, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
The Stamp Act was a direct tax on a wide range of paper goods, affecting a broad segment of the colonial population, including lawyers, merchants, and publishers, among others. In contrast, the Sugar Act was a trade regulation that primarily affected merchants involved in the importation of sugar and molasses, thus having a more concentrated impact on residents of colonial ports.