Asked by Gurpreet Verka on May 06, 2024
Verified
Historically, libel was seen as more deliberate and more permanent than slander, and therefore more harmful. Today, means of mass communication give slander a potentially huge audience, so the rationale for distinguishing between them is breaking down. Explain how the law is changing in light of this.
Libel
A false and malicious published statement that damages someone's reputation.
Slander
Spoken defamation.
Mass Communication
The process of creating, sending, receiving, and analyzing messages to a large audience through various media channels.
- Apprehend the essential legal theories and mechanisms of defense in the realm of defamation law.
- Clarify the relevance of the distinction between libel and slander in the context of changing media environments and their legal implications.
Verified Answer
DP
Daniel PierreMay 10, 2024
Final Answer :
Statutory changes in some provinces have eliminated this distinction altogether. In other provinces, defamation that has been broadcast is considered to be libel, not slander.
Learning Objectives
- Apprehend the essential legal theories and mechanisms of defense in the realm of defamation law.
- Clarify the relevance of the distinction between libel and slander in the context of changing media environments and their legal implications.