Asked by Eskarlin Sanchez on May 26, 2024

verifed

Verified

Gunnar and his brother Henrik were directors, officers and each 26% shareholders in Evergold Resources, a mining exploration company with claims in Indonesia. Evergold was undertaking exploration on its claims when Henrik's laboratory results on site yielded the existence of a major gold find. The result was a dramatic departure from other samples and seemed to indicate an isolated high-quality vein of gold. Gunnar, in Vancouver, released a press report as to the find. The shares of Evergold began a dramatic run-up in price as a result. Henrik double-checked his work, and the results (though very exceptional) were correct. A further week later, Henrik discovered an anonymous note in his tent at the camp that one of his locally hired laboratory geologists had been involved in a tampering scandal some years before. He telephoned this information to Gunnar, who advised Henrik to thoroughly check the results again. Gunnar immediately sold a third of his own shares in Evergold and reported his trade. The insider trade alarmed the market, which also promptly sold Evergold, depressing its price. The anonymous note proved baseless, and on subsequent announcement of the repeated test confirming the gold strike, Evergold shares rebounded to their previous level. Henrik would be considered a "tipper" under the relevant provincial Securities Act.

Tampering Scandal

A situation involving unauthorized alteration or manipulation, often in a legal, sports, or corporate context, that leads to controversy or legal action.

Insider Trade

Buying or selling of a publicly-traded company's stock by someone who has non-public, material information about that stock.

Provincial Securities Act

Legislation that governs the regulation of securities within a specific province, aiming to protect investors and ensure fair and efficient capital markets.

  • Comprehend the fundamental concepts of insider trading and its resultant effects.
  • Understand the meanings and identifications of insiders along with their legal consequences.
verifed

Verified Answer

DA
Dumilde AssuncaoMay 31, 2024
Final Answer :
False
Explanation :
Henrik would not be considered a "tipper" under the relevant provincial Securities Act because he did not disclose non-public information for the purpose of trading; instead, he communicated concerns about the validity of the results to Gunnar for verification, without the intention of influencing stock trades.