Asked by Melissa Washburn on Apr 25, 2024
Verified
Governments that chose to make endangered elephants private goods have met with more success protecting elephants than governments that chose to make killing elephants illegal.
Endangered Elephants
Elephant species that are at risk of extinction due to factors such as habitat loss, poaching, and human-wildlife conflict.
Private Goods
Goods that are excludable and rival in consumption, meaning one person's consumption prevents others from enjoying it.
- Recognize the role of property rights in resource allocation and their importance in environmental conservation.
- Evaluate the performance of different methods in administering the consumption of collective resources and the safeguarding of communal goods.
Verified Answer
RS
Rakshya ShresthaApr 27, 2024
Final Answer :
True
Explanation :
Privatizing elephants has led to better protection because private owners have a financial incentive to ensure their survival and reproduction, unlike in cases where elephants are simply protected by laws against killing, which are often difficult to enforce.
Learning Objectives
- Recognize the role of property rights in resource allocation and their importance in environmental conservation.
- Evaluate the performance of different methods in administering the consumption of collective resources and the safeguarding of communal goods.
Related questions
One Person's Use of Common Resources Does Not Reduce the ...
When a Highway Is Congested, Giving Rise to Negative Externalities ...
Pollution Is a Negative Externality, but It Is Not Appropriate ...
Nontoll Roads Can Be Either Public Goods or Common Resources ...
Depending on Congestion, National Parks Can Be Either a Common ...