Asked by Jacob Rosmarin on May 28, 2024

verifed

Verified

France and England both produce wine and cloth with constant opportunity costs.France can produce 150 barrels of wine if it produces no cloth or 100 bolts of cloth if it produces no wine.England can produce 50 barrels of wine if it produces no cloth or 100 bolts of cloth if it produces no wine.Using this information,we can conclude that:

A) France has a comparative advantage in cloth production.
B) England has a comparative advantage in cloth production.
C) France has a comparative advantage in both goods.
D) mutually beneficial international trade is not possible.

Comparative Advantage

An economic principle that states a country or individual can produce goods at a lower opportunity cost than others, leading to more efficient global trade outcomes.

France

A country in Western Europe known for its rich history, culture, and significant contributions to art, science, and politics.

England

A country that is part of the United Kingdom, known for its rich history, cultural landmarks, and as a global financial center.

  • Execute the concept of comparative and absolute advantages in the realm of international trade and their contribution to the determination of trade flows.
  • Evaluate the effects of specialization and trade on countries' production and consumption outcomes.
verifed

Verified Answer

JR
Jadia RobinsonMay 30, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
England has a lower opportunity cost of producing cloth, as it can produce 100 bolts of cloth compared to France's 100 bolts only at the cost of giving up on producing 50 barrels of wine. Therefore, England has a comparative advantage in cloth production. France has a comparative advantage in wine production, as it can produce 150 barrels of wine compared to England's 50 barrels only at the cost of giving up on producing 100 bolts of cloth. Since both countries have a comparative advantage in different goods, mutually beneficial international trade is possible.