Explain the difficulties involved in achieving completely "value-free" sociology. How might a researcher potentially add bias to the outcomes of the research? How do most sociologists resolve the issue of objectivity in research?

Achieving completely "value-free" sociology is a difficult task because sociologists, like all individuals, have their own values, beliefs, and biases that can influence their research. These personal values can impact the way a researcher selects their research topic, collects and interprets data, and presents their findings. For example, a researcher may unconsciously choose to study a topic that aligns with their own beliefs, or they may interpret data in a way that supports their pre-existing views.

One way a researcher can potentially add bias to the outcomes of their research is through the selection and interpretation of data. They may choose to include or exclude certain data points based on their own biases, or they may interpret the data in a way that supports their own beliefs. Additionally, the language and framing of research findings can also be influenced by the researcher's biases, potentially leading to a skewed presentation of the results.

Most sociologists resolve the issue of objectivity in research by being transparent about their own biases and values, and by employing rigorous research methods to minimize the impact of these biases. This can include using multiple methods of data collection, seeking input from colleagues with different perspectives, and critically examining their own assumptions and interpretations. Additionally, many sociologists strive to maintain a reflexive approach to their research, constantly questioning their own biases and considering alternative viewpoints. By acknowledging and addressing their own biases, sociologists can work towards producing more objective and reliable research outcomes.