Asked by Riranda Moorman on Jun 04, 2024
Verified
Eric bought a new snowmobile from the North Pole Manufacturing Company. After buying the machine, Eric then modified it in order to soup it up. In February, just after a snowfall, Eric was driving the snowmobile, when it tipped over, trapping him beneath it. His leg was severely burned. Eric now wants to sue North Pole for strict liability. Eric:
A) will likely win the suit, because of the faulty design of the snowmobile.
B) will likely lose the suit, because the machine has been altered since its manufacture.
C) has assumed the risk of using the snowmobile.
D) cannot sue the manufacturer, because horizontal privity is lacking.
Strict Liability
A legal doctrine holding an individual or entity responsible for damages or harm caused without the need for proof of negligence or fault.
Modified
This term refers to something that has been changed or altered from its original form.
Snowmobile
A motorized vehicle designed for travel over snow, typically operated on open terrain or established trails.
- Distinguish between various defenses available to manufacturers or sellers in product liability cases.
- Understand the implications of modification or misuse of a product on product liability claims.
Verified Answer
AV
Andrea VillaJun 11, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
B) Eric will likely lose the suit because he modified the snowmobile after purchasing it. Modifications can alter the performance and safety of a product, potentially absolving the manufacturer of liability for injuries caused by the modified product.
Learning Objectives
- Distinguish between various defenses available to manufacturers or sellers in product liability cases.
- Understand the implications of modification or misuse of a product on product liability claims.