Asked by Kyndal Frain on Jul 04, 2024
Verified
Dissenting opinions can be used as
A) sources of law.
B) primary sources.
C) persuasive authorities.
D) primary sources and persuasive authorities.
Dissenting Opinions
Written opinions by judges who disagree with the majority viewpoint in a court decision, outlining their reasoning and legal interpretation.
Persuasive Authorities
Legal materials that a court can consult for guidance but are not binding, such as decisions from other jurisdictions or legal treatises.
Primary Sources
Original documents or physical objects which were written or created during the time under study.
- Gain insight into the roles and ramifications of distinct judicial opinions, including majority, dissenting, concurring, and unanimous.
- Acquire knowledge of legal precedents and their effects on future legal decisions.
Verified Answer
ZK
Zybrea KnightJul 10, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
Dissenting opinions, while not binding, can be used as persuasive authorities in legal arguments to support a position or interpretation of the law. They are not considered sources of law or primary sources in the context of legal hierarchy.
Learning Objectives
- Gain insight into the roles and ramifications of distinct judicial opinions, including majority, dissenting, concurring, and unanimous.
- Acquire knowledge of legal precedents and their effects on future legal decisions.