Asked by Samantha Shaughnessy on May 12, 2024

verifed

Verified

Delta Water Company is subject to a decision by the Environmental Protection Agency. Delta appeals the decision, arguing that it is arbitrary and capricious. This could mean that the decision

A) changed the agency's prior policy without justification.
B) followed a consideration of all legally appropriate factors.
C) was accompanied by a rational explanation.
D) was plainly warranted by the evidence.

Arbitrary And Capricious

A standard for reviewing administrative and judicial decisions, referring to actions taken without reasonable justification or disregard for facts.

Environmental Protection Agency

A government agency tasked with regulating and enforcing national guidelines on environmental issues to protect human health and the environment.

Delta Water Company

A named entity that could refer to a specific water utility or company involved in the distribution or management of water resources, though the exact reference is generic without further context.

  • Comprehend the foundational concepts and methods used in the agency interpretations of legal statutes.
verifed

Verified Answer

JB
Jenna BrooksMay 18, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
The term "arbitrary and capricious" is often used in legal contexts to describe a decision that is made without consideration for the facts, lacks a rational basis, or deviates from established policy without justification. Therefore, if Delta Water Company argues that a decision is arbitrary and capricious, it could mean that the agency changed its prior policy without providing adequate justification for doing so.