Asked by Manar Mahmoud on May 18, 2024

verifed

Verified

Define direct evidence.Define circumstantial evidence. What is the difference? Define relevant evidence and explain why evidence must be relevant. Is relevant evidence always admitted?

Direct Evidence

Evidence that directly proves a fact, without needing inference or presumption.

Circumstantial Evidence

Evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact, rather than direct observation.

Relevant Evidence

Information presented in a legal trial that is directly related to the facts in issue, helping to prove or disprove an element of the case.

  • Recognize the role and significance of evidence, including types of evidence in legal investigations.
verifed

Verified Answer

IB
Isabel BayasMay 18, 2024
Final Answer :
Direct evidence is any evidence that, if believed, establishes the truth of the fact in question.
Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence offered to establish, by inference, the likelihood of a fact that is in question. Circumstantial evidence differs from direct evidence in that it does not directly establish the fact in question but only the degree of likelihood of the fact's existence. Relevant evidence is evidence that tends to prove or disprove a fact in question. Evidence must be relevant in order to be admitted in court; however, relevant evidence will not always be admitted. This is true when the probative value of the evidence is outweighed by other considerations, such as evidence that is unnecessary, distracting to the jury, misleading to the jury, or likely to cause an emotional decision by the jury.