Compare functionalist and conflict-theory views of group loyalty. Illustrate with examples.

Functionalists view group loyalty as a natural and necessary part of society, serving to maintain social order and stability. According to functionalist perspective, group loyalty helps to create a sense of belonging and identity, and it promotes cooperation and unity within a society. For example, in a functionalist view, patriotism and national loyalty are seen as important for maintaining social cohesion and stability within a country.

On the other hand, conflict theorists view group loyalty as a tool used by those in power to maintain their dominance and control over others. From a conflict theory perspective, group loyalty can be used to perpetuate inequality and oppression within society. For example, conflict theorists might argue that loyalty to a particular social or economic class serves to perpetuate the power and privilege of that class at the expense of others.

In summary, while functionalists see group loyalty as a positive force that promotes social cohesion and stability, conflict theorists view it as a mechanism for maintaining power differentials and perpetuating social inequality. These contrasting views highlight the different ways in which group loyalty can be understood within the context of society.