Citing specific examples, explain the difference between President Roosevelt's diplomatic style in dealing with the nations of Central America and in dealing with the major powers of Europe and Asia.

President Roosevelt's diplomatic style in dealing with the nations of Central America was characterized by a more interventionist and assertive approach. For example, in 1904, he issued the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, which asserted the United States' right to intervene in the internal affairs of Latin American countries to prevent European intervention. This was demonstrated in his handling of the Panama Canal, where he supported a rebellion in Panama to gain control of the canal zone.

In contrast, President Roosevelt's diplomatic style in dealing with the major powers of Europe and Asia was more focused on negotiation and diplomacy. For example, he mediated the end of the Russo-Japanese War in 1905, earning a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts. He also negotiated the Treaty of Portsmouth, which ended the conflict between Russia and Japan.

Overall, President Roosevelt's approach to diplomacy in Central America was more interventionist and assertive, while his approach to major powers in Europe and Asia was more focused on negotiation and mediation.