Asked by Minh Anh Tr?n Ng?c on Jun 25, 2024
Verified
Catherine decided to have lunch at Tom's,one of the most popular restaurants in town.She ordered soup before her main course.The soup served to Catherine contained a maggot floating about in it.Fortunately,she noticed this before she ate it.She sued Tom's for negligence.The most likely result will be:
A) Catherine will not win since she did not sustain any damages.
B) Catherine will not win as maggots in soup are foreseeable.
C) Catherine will win if she proves emotional distress.
D) Catherine will win because the restaurant failed to exercise due care.
Emotional Distress
A legal term describing significant mental suffering or anguish inflicted upon a person through wrongful actions by another, which may be grounds for a lawsuit.
Due Care
The effort made by an ordinarily prudent or reasonable party to avoid harm to another party.
Negligence
The failure to exercise a level of care that a reasonably prudent person would in similar circumstances, leading to unintended harm or damage.
- Recognize the possible consequences and protective measures in cases of negligence, incorporating the function of compensations and the idea of risk acceptance.
- Comprehend the utilization of negligence principles within particular contexts and how individual attributes or states can modify legal norms.
Verified Answer
ZK
Zybrea KnightJul 02, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
Proof that the defendant breached a duty does not guarantee that the plaintiff will win a negligence case.The plaintiff must also prove that the defendant's breach caused her to experience injury.
Learning Objectives
- Recognize the possible consequences and protective measures in cases of negligence, incorporating the function of compensations and the idea of risk acceptance.
- Comprehend the utilization of negligence principles within particular contexts and how individual attributes or states can modify legal norms.