Asked by Nicholas Grenville on Jul 09, 2024

verifed

Verified

Busy Corp. sent a letter on January 12th to Slow Co. offering to sell its main office building for $250,000, stating that its offer was open only until January 20th, and it must have a response from Slow Co. by then. Slow Co. received the letter on January 14th and prepared a letter of acceptance on that day but had not posted it. The next morning Busy Corp. called and said that it had changed its mind and was withdrawing its offer.

A) There was a contract as soon as Slow Co. wrote the letter of acceptance and the revocation is too late.
B) Since the revocation was made by telephone and the offer was made by letter, the revocation is not effective.
C) The revocation was effective because it was communicated to Slow Co. before the acceptance was sent.
D) The revocation was effective because it was communicated to Slow Co. before the acceptance was received by Busy Corp.
E) All of the above are false.

Revocation

The termination of an offer by notice communicated to the offeree before acceptance.

Acceptance

A statement or act given in response to and in accordance with an offer.

Offer

A tentative promise subject to a condition.

  • Understand the principles of offer and acceptance in contract formation.
  • Analyze the effect of communication modes on the validity of contract acceptance and revocation.
verifed

Verified Answer

JV
John Vincent QuaicoeJul 10, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
DThe revocation of an offer is effective when it is communicated to the offeree before they dispatch their acceptance. In this scenario, Busy Corp. effectively revoked its offer by informing Slow Co. before Slow Co. had sent its acceptance letter. The method of communication (telephone versus letter) does not invalidate the revocation.