Asked by OmegaMan 87272 on May 16, 2024
Verified
Bob's threat to breach an existing contract unless Lauren makes another contract with Bob is considered:
A) an act of duress,because breach of an existing contract violates a criminal statute.
B) an act of duress,depending mainly on the coerciveness of the threat.
C) not an act of duress,because it does not involve physical force.
D) not an act of duress,because breaking a contract normally does not violate a criminal statute.
Duress
Unlawful pressure or coercion used on a person to compel them to perform an act against their will or judgment.
Breach
An act of breaking or failing to observe a law, agreement, or code of conduct, similar to a violation but often used in the context of contracts.
Contract
A legal agreement between two or more parties that creates obligations which are enforceable or recognized by law.
- Familiarize oneself with the criteria necessary for setting up a cause of action related to fraud or duress in contract legislation.
Verified Answer
RH
Rachael Hughes RobillardMay 22, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
The person complaining of duress must be able to prove that the coercive nature of the improper threat was such that he had no reasonable alternative but to enter or modify the contract.
Learning Objectives
- Familiarize oneself with the criteria necessary for setting up a cause of action related to fraud or duress in contract legislation.