Asked by Keandra Potts on Apr 28, 2024
Verified
Assume that the premise(s) of the following argument are true. Apply the other three tests of the worthiness of an argument in their proper order: "Anthony was at risk of dying from the severe fall that he took when he was climbing. Many who had the same near-fatal experience become averse to climbing afterward. So, Anthony will surely become averse to climbing after his fall." That argument is an example of ________.
A) a fallacy masquerading as a valid inference
B) a fallacy masquerading as a warranted inference
C) a fallacy of relevance
D) a circular argument
E) an argument that is worthy of acceptance, if the premises were in fact true
Near-Fatal Experience
An incident or situation in which someone comes very close to losing their life.
Averse
Having a strong dislike of or opposition to something.
- Acquire the ability to identify and comprehend different types of reasoning errors.
- Identify the differences between evidence types and their significance in substantiating arguments.
Verified Answer
ZK
Zybrea KnightMay 04, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
The argument is valid but not necessarily sound. It passes the test of deductive validity, but the conclusion is not necessarily true as it relies on an assumption about Anthony's psychological response based on the experiences of others. Therefore, it is a fallacy masquerading as a warranted inference.
Learning Objectives
- Acquire the ability to identify and comprehend different types of reasoning errors.
- Identify the differences between evidence types and their significance in substantiating arguments.
Related questions
Consider This Argument: The Kidnappers Have Taken Eight People Hostage ...
Consider This Argument: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Reports ...
Consider This Argument: The Paper Showed a Picture of the ...
What Assumptions Humans Often Seem to Make Is the Basis ...
What Assumption Humans Often Seem to Make Is the Basis ...